Section: New Results

Results on Variability Modeling and Engineering

We have developed automated techniques and a comprehensive environment for synthesizing feature models from various kinds of artefacts (e.g. propositional formula, dependency graph, FMs or product comparison matrices). Specifically we have elaborated a support (through ranking lists, clusters, and logical heuristics) for choosing a sound and meaningful hierarchy  [93] . We have performed an empirical evaluation on hundreds of feature models, coming from the SPLOT repository and Wikipedia  [92] . We have showed that a hybrid approach mixing logical and ontological techniques outperforms state-of-the-art solutions (to appear in Empirical Software Engineering journal in 2015 [20] ). We have also considered numerical information and feature attributes so that we are now capable of synthesizing attributed feature models from product descriptions [51] .

Besides, we have developed techniques for reverse engineering variability in generators and configurators (e.g., video generators) [50] . We have identified new research directions for protecting variability [44] mainly due to the fact reverse engineering techniques (previously presented) are effective .

Product Comparison Matrices (PCMs) constitute a rich source of data for comparing a set of related and competing products over numerous features. PCMs can be seen as a formalism for modeling a family of products, including variability information. Despite their apparent simplicity, PCMs contain heterogeneous, ambiguous, uncontrolled and partial information that hinders their efficient exploitations. We have formalized PCMs through model-based automated techniques and developed additional tooling to support the edition and re-engineering of PCMs  [94] . 20 participants used our editor to evaluate our PCM metamodel and automated transformations. The empirical results over 75 PCMs from Wikipedia show that (1) a significant proportion of the formalization of PCMs can be automated: 93.11% of the 30061 cells are correctly formalized; (2) the rest of the formalization can be realized by using the editor and mapping cells to existing concepts of the metamodel. The ASE'2014 paper opens avenues for engaging a community in the mining, re-engineering, edition, and exploitation of PCMs that now abound on the Internet. We have launched an open, collaborative initiative towards this direction https://opencompare.org/

Another axis is the mining of PCMs since (1) the manual elaboration of PCMs has limitations (2) numerous sources of information can be combined and are amenable to PCMs. We have developed MatrixMiner a tool for automatically synthesizing PCMs from a set of product descriptions written in natural language [46] . MatrixMiner is capable of identifying and organizing features and values in a PCM despite the informality and absence of structure in the textual descriptions of products. More information is available online: https://matrix-miner.variability.io/